There’s not a single word about “permission” in that statement, and no sign that Grammarly is walking back the idea. It sounds like the company fully intends to keep pretending real human beings are ...

A recently-added feature in Grammarly purports to improve users’ writing with help from the world's great writers and ...

The tool, offered by the recently-rebranded company Superhuman, gives feedback based on the work of famous dead and living ...

Grammarly’s Expert Review feature is facing backlash for using real expert personas without approval, including at least one ...

The AI-generated feedback included comments that appeared to be from The Verge’s editor-in-chief, Nilay Patel, as well as ...

Grammarly's AI-powered "Expert Review" promises "writing feedback by subject-matter experts," and if you write about journalism, there's a good chance that includes you.

The platform offers users AI-generated feedback under the names of scholars by drawing on their accessible publications. Some ...

Grammarly’s AI “Expert Review” feature attributes writing suggestions to real experts without their consent, raising concerns ...

Grammarly's “Expert Review” feature uses AI to give feedback through the lens of noted writers and scholars—some of whom are no longer living.

Grammarly's new feature, Expert Review, promises expert writing advice but lacks input from actual subject matter experts.

Grammarly’s latest complete waste of time, money, and resources isn’t a more advanced comma-splice detector, but rather a chance for AI Chatbots to learn the verbiage of writers, living or dead, under ...

The Grammarly "Expert Review" feature uses AI to provide feedback on papers using the name and work of real professors, dead ...